Please take a moment to read this short note. In brief: this website is for general information only, you are here of your own choice, and nothing on it is an advertisement or a solicitation of work.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise.
By clicking "I Agree" below, the user acknowledges and confirms the following:
1. There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Adv. Suryanarayan M. Nadar or any of his associates to solicit any work through this website.
2. The purpose of this website is to provide the user with information about Adv. Suryanarayan M. Nadar, his qualifications and areas of practice, for the user's own information and use, provided entirely at the user's own request.
3. The information provided on this website is solely available at the user's request for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertising.
4. The information contained herein does not constitute legal advice. It is not intended to create, and the receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.
5. In cases where the user has any legal issues, they must seek independent legal advice from qualified legal practitioners.
6. This website is designed and maintained in compliance with the rules and regulations prescribed under the Advocates Act, 1961 and the Bar Council of India Rules (Part VI, Chapter II).
7. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Adv. Suryanarayan M. Nadar.
By clicking "I Agree," you acknowledge that you wish to gain more information about Adv. Suryanarayan M. Nadar at your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation.
Essential information about Section 138 NI Act that every cheque holder and accused person must know.
A plain-language overview of the scheme of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — the demand notice, the statutory periods, the presumptions, and the stages through which a matter passes. General information only; not legal advice.
A plain-language overview of the sections most often relevant to a cheque-dishonour matter. This is general information about the law, not advice on any particular case.
Dishonour of a cheque for insufficiency of funds (or because it exceeds the arrangement with the bank), where the cheque was drawn for a legally enforceable debt or liability. Punishable with imprisonment up to two years, or fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both — subject to the notice and non-payment conditions.
Raises certain presumptions about negotiable instruments, including that the instrument was made or drawn for consideration, unless the contrary is proved.
Presumes, until the contrary is shown, that the holder received the cheque in discharge of a debt or liability. The presumption is rebuttable; the burden of rebutting it lies on the accused.
It is not a defence for the drawer to say that they had no reason to believe, when the cheque was issued, that it might be dishonoured.
Where the drawer is a company or firm, the person who was in charge of and responsible for its business, along with the entity itself, may be liable. The complaint must contain specific averments to that effect.
A court takes cognizance only on a written complaint by the payee or holder in due course, filed within one month of the cause of action. Jurisdiction ordinarily lies where the payee's bank branch is situated.
Section 143A allows a court to direct interim compensation of up to 20% of the cheque amount during trial. Section 148 allows an appellate court to direct a deposit of at least 20% of the fine or compensation awarded.
Every offence under the Act is compoundable, which allows parties to settle the matter with the leave of the court at appropriate stages.
The ordinary course of a Section 138 matter, in outline. Steps and timelines can vary with the facts of a case.
The cheque is presented within its period of validity (ordinarily three months) and the bank returns it unpaid with a memo stating the reason.
The holder obtains the cheque return memo and notes the date it was received — this date starts the statutory clock.
A written notice demanding payment is sent to the drawer within 30 days of receiving the return memo.
The drawer has 15 days from receiving the notice to pay. A cause of action arises only if payment is not made within that period.
A written complaint is filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate within one month of the cause of action.
The Magistrate examines the complaint, takes cognizance, and issues process (a summons) to the accused.
Plea, the complainant's evidence (often on affidavit under Section 145), cross-examination, the statement of the accused, any defence evidence, and arguments.
The matter ends in acquittal or conviction. A convicted person may appeal to the Court of Session. Compensation to the complainant may also be ordered.
A quick reference to the main time limits under Section 138. These are general and their exact computation depends on the facts.
Terms that come up frequently in cheque-dishonour matters, in plain language.
The person who signs the cheque and orders the bank to pay.
The bank on which the cheque is drawn and which is directed to pay.
The person named in the cheque to whom payment is to be made.
A person who obtains the instrument for value, in good faith, before it is overdue.
The bank's refusal to pay the cheque — for example, for insufficiency of funds.
The slip issued by the bank recording the fact and reason for the dishonour.
The written notice demanding payment, required before a complaint can be filed.
The point at which the right to file a complaint arises — after the 15-day period ends unpaid.
The court's act of taking notice of the offence so that proceedings can begin.
Settlement of the offence between the parties, with the leave of the court.
An amount a court may direct the drawer to pay during trial under Section 143A.
A debt or liability that the law recognises and permits to be recovered.
All content on this page is general information about the law, provided at the visitor's own request. It is not legal advice, does not create a lawyer–client relationship, and should not be acted upon without independent advice on the specific facts.
General informational articles on Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the procedure in cheque-dishonour matters, and reported judgments. Provided for reference only; not legal advice.
A cheque bounce is not merely a financial inconvenience. Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, it is a criminal offence — one that carries imprisonment of up to two years, a fine of up to twice the cheque amount, or both.
Read More →Cheque bounce cases are among the most common financial disputes in India. When a cheque is returned unpaid due to insufficient funds or other valid reasons, the payee can initiate legal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Read More →The mere bouncing of a cheque is not an offence. The offence under Section 138 is constituted only when three conditions are cumulatively satisfied: a cheque is dishonoured by the bank; the payee issues a written demand notice within 30 days of the return memo; and the drawer fails to pay within 15 days of that notice.
Read More →