Advocate · Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa · MAH/4247/2012

Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

The area of practice of these chambers is confined to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — the dishonour of a cheque, in everyday use called a cheque bounce case.

Matters are conducted at four stages: the statutory demand notice, the complaint, the summary trial, and the appeal or revision. They are conducted before the Magistrate and Sessions Courts at Mumbai and before the Bombay High Court.

Both sides of a matter are acted for — the holder of a dishonoured cheque, and the person on whom a notice or a summons has been served.

Chapter XVII prescribes a sequence of periods. Each runs from a different event, and the offence is made out only where every one of them has been answered.

The periods, the order in which they run, the provision each comes from, and the rule that fixes the court before which a complaint lies are set out on the pages that follow.

Chambers hours · Mon–Sat, 10 AM–5 PM Either side of a matter — holder or drawer

The advocate speaks and understands English, Hindi, Marathi and Tamil. A consultation may be held in whichever of the four the person is most at ease in.

This website is information only, furnished at the visitor's own request. It is not an advertisement, an offer of services, or a solicitation of work.
Adv. Suryanarayan M. Nadar
Adv. Suryanarayan M. Nadar
Advocate
Enrolled 18 August 2012 · MAH/4247/2012
Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa
Shop No. 3, Harmony CHS Ltd, G. B. Marg,
Opposite Orlem Church, Malad West, Mumbai 400064
+91 70455 53656 · WhatsApp
advocate@suryanadar.com
Monday to Saturday, 10 AM – 5 PM
By prior appointment only
Chambers
Shop No. 3, Harmony CHS Ltd, G.B. Marg,
Opposite Orlem Church, Orlem, Malad West,
Mumbai 400064
Telephone
Hours
Monday to Saturday
10 AM–5 PM
By prior appointment only

Two sides of the same section

A matter under Section 138 has a holder and a drawer, and the law gives each of them a different set of questions to answer. The two are set out separately below.

I.

Where a cheque held by a person has been dishonoured

What Section 138 requires before an offence is made out, the periods prescribed by the section and by Section 142, and the event from which each of them begins to run.

II.

Where a notice or a summons has been served on a person

What a demand notice and a summons mean in law, how the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 operate, what displaces them, and which defences the courts have recognised.

Every matter turns on its own facts. A person with a question of their own should take independent advice from a qualified legal practitioner. The particulars of these chambers are on the Contact page.

The Act itself, in full

All seventeen chapters and every one of the 148 sections of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, reproduced in statutory order on a single page — provisos, explanations and illustrations retained, searchable by section number or phrase, with a plain-language note on each of the cheque-dishonour provisions of Chapter XVII.

Nothing on that page links away to another site.

17
Chapters, in statutory order
148
Sections, reproduced in full
1881
Act No. 26 — in force from 1 March 1882
2018
As amended — ss. 143A and 148 inserted

Principles the courts have settled

A short selection of reported decisions on Section 138, in summary only. The summaries are the author's own and are not a substitute for the reports themselves.

Supreme Court of India

The presumption under Section 139 extends to the existence of a legally enforceable debt

Rangappa v. Sri Mohan · (2010) 11 SCC 441
A three-Judge Bench held that the presumption under Section 139 is not confined to the cheque having been issued for consideration, but includes a presumption that it was issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other liability. The presumption is rebuttable, and the accused may discharge that burden on the standard of preponderance of probabilities, including by relying on the material brought by the complainant.
Supreme Court of India

How the presumption may be rebutted

Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa · (2019) 5 SCC 418
The Court collected the earlier authorities on Sections 118(a) and 139. The presumption operates until the contrary is proved. The accused need not enter the witness box, and may rely on the case set up by the complainant. But bare denial, without material from which a probable defence emerges, will not suffice.
Supreme Court of India

A signed cheque voluntarily handed over

Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar · (2019) 4 SCC 197
Where a signed but otherwise blank cheque is voluntarily delivered towards a payment, the holder is entitled, in the absence of evidence of the loss of the instrument or of its being obtained by coercion or intimidation, to the presumption under Section 139. Section 20 of the Act permits the holder of an inchoate stamped instrument, delivered to him, to complete it.
The reported decisions, in summary

The judgments summarised above are reported decisions of the Supreme Court of India and are in the public domain. They are cited for the general propositions of law they lay down. No representation is made that the advocate appeared in any of them, and nothing above is a representation or assurance as to the outcome of any matter.

The advocate, in particulars

Set out below are the plain particulars of the advocate and of the chambers — name, enrolment, where the chambers are, when they are open, the languages spoken there, and the area of practice. They are published for the general information of a visitor who has come here of their own accord. Their publication is not an advertisement and is not a solicitation of work.

Name & Enrolment

Name: Suryanarayan M. Nadar (Nadar Suryanarayan Murgesh, as on the Roll)
Enrolment Number: MAH/4247/2012
Date of Enrolment: 18 August 2012
State Bar Council: Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa

Chambers & Contact

Office: Shop No. 3, Harmony CHS Ltd, G. B. Marg, Opposite Orlem Church, Orlem, Malad West, Mumbai 400064
Office Hours: Monday to Saturday, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM (consultations by prior appointment only)
Languages spoken and understood: English, Hindi, Marathi and Tamil — a consultation may be held in any of the four

Area of Practice

Area of Practice: Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — cheque dishonour matters, commonly called cheque bounce cases
Stages: Statutory demand notice (commonly called a legal notice), complaint, trial, appeal and revision
Sides: Complainant and accused alike
Forums: Magistrate Courts and Sessions Courts, Mumbai; Bombay High Court

The particulars stated above are true and genuine to the best of the advocate's knowledge, and nothing beyond them is published. Nothing on this website is intended to be, and nothing should be read as, an advertisement, a solicitation of work, or an inducement of any kind. The rules of the Bar Council of India under which this website is published are set out on the Disclaimer page.

Where matters under Section 138 are conducted

Magistrate Courts and Sessions Courts at Borivali, Andheri, Bandra and Mazgaon · Bombay High Court

A note on this website

An advocate in India may not solicit work or advertise, directly or indirectly. This website has been prepared on that footing. Everything on it falls into one of three categories, and nothing on it falls outside them.

First — a plain particular of the advocate: name, enrolment, qualifications, area of practice. Second — a neutral statement of statutory law, or of a reported judgment, published for the visitor's general information at the visitor's own request. Third — plain factual information about the chambers: where they are, when they are open, and what languages are spoken there. That third category is published for one reason only: so that a person who has already decided, of their own accord, to make contact knows when and where to do so.

It is not an advertisement. It is not an offer of services, and not a solicitation or inducement of any kind. The particulars stated on it are true and genuine to the best of the advocate's knowledge.

This website itself operates no enquiry form, no chat facility and no case-intake of any sort. It takes no case details from anyone.

The rules of the Bar Council of India under which a website of this kind may be published, and the full terms on which this one is published, are set out on the Disclaimer page. How information is handled is set out in the Privacy Notice.

What This Website Does Not Carry

No claim of superiority or comparative merit, and no superlative — no “best”, “leading”, “top” or “expert”.
No testimonial, review, endorsement, star rating, ranking, badge or award.
No statement of any result obtained in any matter, and no success rate.
No reference to any client, and no reference to any case in which the advocate has been or is engaged.
No promise, assurance or prediction of the outcome of anything, and no fee quoted for anything.
No enquiry form, no chat box, no callback request and no lead capture. Nothing typed into this website leaves the browser.

Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it or from communicating through it. A person with a legal question should obtain independent advice from a qualified legal practitioner on their own facts. Statutory provisions and judicial decisions referred to on this website are stated as they were understood at the time of writing and may since have been amended, overruled or explained.